🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering parallel bans.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban remains "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to approve a law raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised parents to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering harmful platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional government level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced bills requiring adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of the West, further countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies take a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and others show that governments around the world are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.